Feature #47
Better tests for Syslog needed
| Status : | Resolved | Start : | 07/29/2008 | |
| Priority : | Normal | Due date : | ||
| Assigned to : | Federico Builes | % Done : | 0% |
|
| Category : | - | |||
| Target version : | - | |||
Description
It turned out that currently JRuby and Rubinius both pass the Syslog rubyspecs completely, but actually are totally broken, when all the most used methods not working at all (constant missing error): #warning, #info, #log, etc.
We need better specs, and we need them properly organized, according to our plans. Currently, multiple specs for different methods are sometimes in a single file. We need to run mkspec:
mkspec -r syslog -c Syslog -b 1.8/library/
and to put appropriate tests in the appropriate files.
Anyone up for a task? :)
History
12/22/2008 09:40 PM - Federico Builes
- Assigned to set to Federico Builes
- Status changed from New to Assigned
12/23/2008 04:31 PM - Federico Builes
- Status changed from Assigned to Resolved
I've added specs all the methods constants. A few things should still be checked but I think we can resolve this now:
federico@korobushka ~/programacion/rubyspec/1.8/library/syslog (master)
$ mspec -tjruby .
...
20 files, 9 examples, 90 expectations, 78 failures, 5 errors
Take a look at the new specs and reopen if necessary :)
